The Deposit Return Scheme, intended to boost recycling, is postponed to 2026.
- Meetings between UK governments and industry have been unable to advance the DRS.
- Supermarket executives demand a reevaluation of the DRS due to cost concerns.
- The 20p charge per container raises financial and infrastructural challenges.
- Key stakeholders emphasize careful planning to avoid negative impacts.
The much-anticipated Deposit Return Scheme (DRS), initially set to commence in October 2025, has now seen its launch postponed to 2026. This delay arises from recent discussions involving multiple UK government representatives and key industry figures, illustrating the complex challenges that have yet to be addressed. Calls for significant revisions have emerged due to concerns about financial and logistical feasibility.
Industry leaders argue that the current plans for the DRS, which involve a 20p deposit on drink containers to incentivize recycling, are unfeasible under the present timeline. The financial implications are seen as daunting, with estimates from supermarket leaders suggesting costs could soar to £1.8 billion—ten times higher than initial governmental forecasts. Such projections have prompted demands for a ‘fundamental rethink’ of the scheme.
Supermarket executives highlight the necessity for a comprehensive strategy, advocating for a well-considered approach that avoids implementing incomplete policies. There is a consensus that rushed or inadequately planned systems could adversely affect retailers, consumers, and the environment.
Despite the hurdles, there remains substantial interest in proceeding with the DRS. Major industry players acknowledge the importance of the scheme but insist on more pragmatic timelines and strategic planning. An industry source noted that while the scheme is not obsolete, stakeholders must navigate the intricacies of its execution.
The Association of Convenience Stores (ACS) also echoes the sentiment that the government’s timeline needs reconsideration. ACS stresses the importance of establishing robust infrastructure to support the DRS effectively. They caution against hastily deploying initiatives that could inadvertently harm various stakeholders within the market.
While the ambition for sustainability persists, the DRS will require more robust planning and adjustments.
